Opening
You're explaining your proposal in a meeting.
Colleague A presents: "We should implement a comprehensive, multi-phase initiative leveraging cross-functional synergies to optimize our go-to-market strategy."
You present: "Right now we're losing deals because it takes us three weeks to send a quote. This gets it down to three hours."
Which idea does the room remember?
That's contrast in action. Not "my idea is better than yours." Just: abstract vs. concrete. Complex vs. simple. Buzzwords vs. clarity.
The room didn't need to see a full project plan. They instantly knew which person understood the actual problem.
Apple's "I'm a Mac" campaign worked the same way. They showed you two guys: uptight in khakis dealing with viruses, relaxed in jeans making cool stuff. No feature comparison needed. Just: which person do you want to be?
That question answers itself.
Your colleagues can't hold seven reasons why your idea matters. But they can hold one contrast.
The Principle
Your audience can't hold seven arguments in their head. But they can hold one contrast.
John Caples proved this in the 1920s with "before and after" layouts in print ads. Show someone struggling, then show them succeeding—the solution in between almost doesn't matter. People just want to move from the "before" state to the "after" state.
Apple refined it in 2006. Mac vs. PC wasn't about specs. It was about identity: Corporate vs. Creative. Complicated vs. Simple. Problems vs. Solutions.
The genius of contrast is that it forces a binary choice. You're either this or that. Fast or slow. Clear or confusing. Old way or new way.
When you give people two clear options, they don't agonize—they sort themselves instantly based on which future they want.
Your colleagues are listing details. You're going to show two paths and let them choose.
The Prompt
Loading...
Why It Works
Daniel Kahneman's research on decision-making showed that humans use two systems:
- **System 1:** Fast, emotional, intuitive (outcome-based)
- **System 2:** Slow, logical, analytical (detail-based)
When you list reasons and details, you force your audience into System 2. They have to think, compare, weigh options. That's exhausting in a meeting. Many just tune out or postpone deciding.
When you show contrast, you trigger System 1. The brain sees two options and instantly picks the path that's more appealing: "I'm the team that moves fast, not the team stuck in endless process."
The "I'm a Mac" ads worked because nobody wanted to be the uptight PC guy. Not because Macs had objectively better specs—because Mac users had a better experience.
Caples used this in print ads. Hopkins used it in direct mail. Apple made it famous on TV.
The pattern is timeless: show two clear paths, make one obviously more appealing, watch people self-select.
In workplace communication, you're not just presenting information—you're helping people see themselves in the future you're describing. Contrast makes that future visible.
Try This
Do this right now:
Run the prompt above for your next proposal, presentation, or email where you need buy-in.
Pick the contrast that makes you slightly uncomfortable—that's probably the one that's true enough to work but bold enough to matter.
Test it in your next pitch, Slack message, or meeting intro. Don't list all your reasons. Just show the contrast:
"Right now, we [slow/complicated thing]. With this approach, we [fast/simple thing]."
Watch how quickly people lean in. They're not choosing between bullet points—they're choosing between two versions of their future.
That's the power of contrast. That's how you get heard when everyone else is listing reasons.
Want all 50 prompts?
Early pricing. Regular price $197